Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Obitus

January 10th 2007 06:30
: Poetry
Here's a poem folks. But first a little cricket. I should like to say i have been prolifically writing since my last post, but i cannot. What i have been doing prolifically is watching a great deal of cricket and been utterly disappointed by England's performances through the Ashes. The Ashes whitewash couldn't curb my enthusiasm for the ODI's. Ia little 20/20 loss certainly couldn't either. But lads that better not be an indication of England's efforts. Come on Pietersen get primal...i want to see you bat. O and welcome back Vaughany!

oh yeah here's the poem.





Obitus


You are
un-moving on my palm

the weight of fact
you raised
opens the ground up
for scale and fin...

this garden will grow orange and silver
memories

the beauty of your art
shapes

the need to alter the fish to people ratio


83
Vote
   


The Myth Of The Free Society

November 24th 2006 10:00
: ESSAY
The Myth of the Free Society

Sociology is the exploration of self and world and the interwoven labyrinth that lies between them. In order to grasp the reality of this phenomenon, it is essential to use what the discipline of sociology calls the Sociological Imagination. Within this framework, the sociological mystery draws closer to an alternate future. By examining and analyzing the historical, cultural, critical, structural and emotional aspects of the Sociological Imagination, the intimate relationship/s between personal experience and the historical and contemporary world become manifest.


For American sociologist C.Wright Mills (1916-1962), the original advocate of the Sociological Imagination, it was a call that requested the viewing of individual biography amidst the societal structuring of the past and present worlds. It was to instigate self-awareness or incite a reflexive view of self and ultimately situation. All it necessitated was a ‘quality of mind’, a Sociological Imagination (Mills,1970,11)

Mills (1970, 9) believed that an individual’s personal experience was caught up in the intricate webbing that social structures instilled. It was within this realm that one lives out a biography and a destiny, a destiny moulded by bureaucratic boundaries, both implicit and explicit. As it is, ordinary individuals are stringently ‘bounded by the private orbits’, in which they move, and so ‘their visions and their powers are limited’ to their typified milieu (Mills,1970, 9).

In a sense, these illegitimated actors lack the ability to perceive that their existence, their ‘ups and downs’ are related to the ‘seemingly impersonal changes in the structure of continent-wide societies’, and the ‘institutional contradictions’ that rode astonishingly high on the back of sweeping changes created by the Industrial and French Revolutions (Mills,1970,9-10).

They do not ‘grasp the interplay of man (sic) and society’, for the type of ‘men(sic) they are becoming and the history-making in which they may take part’(Mills,1970,10). They do not conceive that both their well-being and ill-will are linked to the social structure that spawns their actions and reactions. ‘Although ‘society provides the scripts for all our dramatis personae’, we are only captives by ‘our own cooperation’, (Berger, 1966,112,140).

What ordinary individuals cannot see is that their ‘personal troubles’ formulate to ‘public issues’, that their ‘employment’ or unemployment is tied to the very structure of society (Mills,1970,9). What Mills (1970,22) ultimately conveys in his Sociological Imagination, is that ‘its task and its promise’ are for reflexive consciousness that relays ‘an understanding of the ultimate realities of ourselves in connexion (sic) with larger social realities’ (Mills,1970,10,22)

‘… Formal democracy is restricted to quite a small portion of mankind(sic)’, The realization ‘that all such sensibilities’ including ‘human reason itself will come to play a greater role in human affairs’,(Mills,1970,10,22). To rephrase, the Sociological Imagination ‘could skillfully combine the personal, the collective, and the historical in an interwoven totality’, to achieve progressive movement, namely in the form of ‘rebellion and revolt’ (Eyerman,1989,544). Entrapment is only present in the incapacitated mind, the mind that cannot formulate ‘uneasiness and indifference’ (Mills,1970,18-19).

It is easy to see how the utilization of such an imagination can lend itself to the discipline of sociology, whose preoccupation is societal interaction. Sociologists such as A.Giddens and E.Wills make no qualms about its effectiveness. In fact, both have written interpretations of Mills’ vision. What is important to note about their renditions is that they make no real elaborations to the original piece. Their developments are merely superficial. They bracket Mills’ ideas into three neat little sensibilities, historical, cultural and critical, with Wills (1995) extending his into a fourth dimension - structural. It appears as an extension, in reality it is no more than a clear-cut re-working. The only definitive difference comes from Wills’ use of contemporary examples to illustrate his point, or should I say Mills’? Furthermore, they miss Mills’ vision.

Wills discussion of the structural sensibility demonstrates what Mills(1970) had discerned three decades earlier. Willis(1995,11) sizes up the present factor of structural determinism and the stranglehold it exerts on ‘free-will’. Secondly, he stresses (as did Mills) the need to look beyond, as Mills(1970,11) would say, “the psychologies” of individuals, in order to understand social phenomena (Willis,1995,11,110).

Willis’ (1995,11)echoing of Mills’ (1970,14) visionary work, comes in the connecting of “personal troubles of milieu” into “the public issues of social structure”. It is from this model that Wilis (1995,67) bases his ‘structural sensibility, a sensibility that understands that sociological phenomena occur as a result of societal interactions (Willis,1995,11,66-67). To emphasize the relationship between ‘unemployment’ and structure, Willis (1995,36) stresses the chameleon influences modern world infrastructure exerts on individual actors. Role players who are suddenly confronted with the real issue of being unemployed often feel a ‘loss of self esteem’ that stems from the ‘initial loss of income’ (Willis,1995,36). The intricate webbing of social structure becomes profoundly clear, with all aspects of life linked to societal structuring and meaning-systems.

On a social-psychological level, it is important to consider the value of the emotions in social role play and the sentiments they hold. Both Mills (1970) and Willis (1995) neglect the advent of emotional sentiment in human actions and interactions. Hochschild (1983,1989,1990) argued that social actors acquire the ability to ‘adapt their emotional displays’, exclusively to suit the action required. Hochschild (1983) makes the analogy with the example of the service industry: ‘flight attendants, regardless of abuse’ are expected to maintain a ‘pleasant and sympathetic’ manner (Deutscher, et a;., 1993,158).

Saying personal experience is influenced by social interaction is clearly not delving deep enough, for even within restricted milieu familiarity can lead to ‘an almost infinite number of dramas’ (Deutscher, et al, 1993,160) Suffice to say, personal experience is influenced by society. But, individual experience is subject to its own intrigue.

Overall, sociology’s utmost concern is one of intellectual enlightenment. The sociological imagination’s ultimate concern is individual enlightenment. This paradox of influence conspires to create our biographies. Our possible futures therefore lie exclusively within our very own minds. To conceive this, is to perceive the quality of mind needed to see that freedom is: knowing all choice and feeling free to make choice. As C.Wright Mills might say, that is the Sociological Imagination’s “task and its promise.”









BIBLIOGRAPHY


Berger,Peter L. (1996), Invitation to Sociology: A Humanistic Perspective, Harmonsdworth, Penguin, 110-140.

Deutscher, I,. F. P. Pestello & H. F. G. Petello (1993), Sentiments and Acts, Aldine De Gruyter, New York, 158-161.

Eyerman, R. (1989), ‘Social Movements: Between History and Sociology’, Theory and Society: Renewal and Critique in Social Theory, 531-545.

Mills, C.W. (1970), The Sociological Imagination, Harmondsworth, Penguin.

Willis, E. (1995), The Sociological Quest: An Introduction to the Study of Social Life, Second Edition, Allen & Unwin.


67
Vote
   


Quote of Quotes

November 15th 2006 03:09
: QUOTE ATTRIBUTING
I do love quotes. This is one I heard quite a while ago, and it stayed with me. Great quotes speak through every Age, I think this one certainly can speak for this Age, the Age of Discontent.

...Civilisation, an old bitch gone in the teeth...

Copyright infringements...halt...can you not see my flag...the author shall be revealed in due time!

The questions I put to you Orblers are:

Who said it?
What does it mean to you?
75
Vote
   


theadora's Blogs

78 Vote(s)
20 Comment(s)
13 Post(s)
Moderated by theadora
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]